contacted by majors

Laureline Laureline 2009-11-25 14:41:27 -0600
Groups:
Fan Club Member

I was wondering if any majors ever asked them to sign in since they went indie ?

PureDedication206 PureDedication206 2009-11-25 14:43:51 -0600
Member since: 2007-06-20 Groups:
Street Team

ooo good question!

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
SheLLi

"Don't bother just to be better than your contemporaries or predecessors. Try to be better than yourself." ~ William Faulkner


martyrnomore martyrnomore 2009-11-25 15:25:27 -0600
Member since: 2007-03-05

I think that would only happen if Hanson had a hit song and a successful album. Unless they created a buzz about themselves, I don't think the rest of the industry really thinks of them at all. Along with 90% of the world's music buyers.

BuckeyeJen BuckeyeJen 2009-11-25 15:41:14 -0600
Groups:
Street Team Fan Club Member

I like them Indie anyways. They would have to shell out alot of their own money to get the buzz going. Since they're family guys now, I don't think they (or the major labels) are looking to be mainstream.

~Jen

you can't deny it...until you try it ;)

Never had a M&G or been a reporter....but here's hoping!!

senske senske 2009-11-25 16:46:08 -0600
Member since: 2008-01-20 Groups:
Fan Club Member

Honestly after all the effort they put in to become independent, I highly doubt they would ever consider going back to mainstream and major labels.

"The first music that you really fall in love with is more than just music." Taylor says, "Its something that clicks in you,beyond the song, it's a message or image that causes you to jump in and not let go."-(Taylor Hanson)

EyesWideOpen EyesWideOpen 2009-11-25 16:56:42 -0600
Groups:
Street Team Fan Club Member

I'd like to believe there was considerable interest in them after Underneath, with them topping the independent chart and all (of course the major label folks keep their eye on independent artists too, always looking for bands who they think can help them cash in, lol). But I agree with senske, I don't think Hanson would even consider that option now. Not until something dramatically changes in the way they treat the artists.

Are we distracted by the sun/ the glittering jewels and the beating drums/ Is it going the distance we fear?

mamajive mamajive 2009-11-25 18:05:59 -0600
Member since: 2000-04-02 Groups:
Street Team Fan Club Member

In the SETB documentary they said they had offers from several major labels but knew that going Independent was the best choice for them. They have had complete control over everything they do with their career now.

 I'm so glad they went Indy and I don't expect them to ever go back to a major label. As far as if they have had any offers since back then, only Hanson knows.

" I'm the walls that close in, I'm the words you won't say, I'm the voice you chose to keep inside and lock away, everyday."

5 of 5 & Bamboozle

sj0126 sj0126 2009-11-25 18:22:38 -0600
Member since: 2008-01-15 Groups:
Fan Club Member Street Team

They would never go back. Why bother going back to needing approval for every little thing you want to do if you can just do it the way you want it now? We would never get any Meet and Greets or reporter interviews or Fan Club Members events and they wouldn't tour as much and CDs would take longer if they were on a major label again.

                       12 Years/// 24 shows

Up Next: 5 for 5 in NYC/Bamboozle!

    

Laureline Laureline 2009-11-26 09:45:15 -0600
Groups:
Fan Club Member

I agree. All this would've never happened if they hadn't gone indie ! And their music would've been different so this is the best reason for them to stay were they are wich is best place to be Smile

Desire Desire 2009-11-26 11:50:47 -0600
Member since: 2006-03-27 Groups:
Street Team Fan Club Member

last thing I heard was that they've considered signing with Arista Records, but that was right before going indie.

there are some pro's and con's, if a band's indie or major..but I think the way it is now  is the way it should be.

Evan Taubenfeld rocks my socks
I appear in the "It's like that" video

EyesWideOpen EyesWideOpen 2009-11-26 11:52:21 -0600
Groups:
Street Team Fan Club Member

QUOTE: sj0126

They would never go back. Why bother going back to needing approval for every little thing you want to do if you can just do it the way you want it now? We would never get any Meet and Greets or reporter interviews or Fan Club Members events and they wouldn't tour as much and CDs would take longer if they were on a major label again.

Why do you think we wouldn't get any Meet & greets if they were on a major label? They did those before 3CG too, right? Almost all bands arrange meet& greets before gigs, indie or not. And I doubt it would have any great impact on the intervals between albums, at least generally. Because it was three years between Underneath and The Walk, and it will be three years between The Walk and the next one. Usually major labels push their bands to release albums every two years or so. Otherwise the fans generally move on to new acts. Making of Underneath was a disaster, but it isn't always so.

Now it sounds like I'm defending major labels, and I truly don't want to, I'm very happy about Hanson being indie! I'm just saying that it isn't always so black and white. Some artists -although admittedly very few- manage to strike a deal where they are granted complete artistic freedom with their music, and in those cases staying on a major label can be a good decision

Are we distracted by the sun/ the glittering jewels and the beating drums/ Is it going the distance we fear?

sj0126 sj0126 2009-11-26 12:05:41 -0600
Member since: 2008-01-15 Groups:
Fan Club Member Street Team

QUOTE: EyesWideOpen

QUOTE: sj0126

They would never go back. Why bother going back to needing approval for every little thing you want to do if you can just do it the way you want it now? We would never get any Meet and Greets or reporter interviews or Fan Club Members events and they wouldn't tour as much and CDs would take longer if they were on a major label again.

Why do you think we wouldn't get any Meet & greets if they were on a major label? They did those before 3CG too, right? Almost all bands arrange meet& greets before gigs, indie or not. And I doubt it would have any great impact on the intervals between albums, at least generally. Because it was three years between Underneath and The Walk, and it will be three years between The Walk and the next one. Usually major labels push their bands to release albums every two years or so. Otherwise the fans generally move on to new acts. Making of Underneath was a disaster, but it isn't always so.

Now it sounds like I'm defending major labels, and I truly don't want to, I'm very happy about Hanson being indie! I'm just saying that it isn't always so black and white. Some artists -although admittedly very few- manage to strike a deal where they are granted complete artistic freedom with their music, and in those cases staying on a major label can be a good decision

Meet and Greets and reporters as we have it set up through the fan club did not happen til they went indie. There were no fan club members events til they went indie. There weren't any fan club members kits til they went indie. You see my point?

It was two years for the Walk. It'll be 3 til the next CD is released but thats only because they have to set up their international stuff. It used to take them around a year for the label to approve the songs they want to do, or never in the case of Underneath, so that they could start recording and actually start making the record. Now they just do it when they feel they have the right time.

A music artist shouldn't release a CD more then like 2 years apart. Their music can't change that much within a year, you know?

                       12 Years/// 24 shows

Up Next: 5 for 5 in NYC/Bamboozle!

    

mikikatie mikikatie 2009-11-26 15:02:44 -0600
Member since: 2007-11-11 Groups:
Fan Club Member Street Team

It doesn't seem like there would be any benefit to them to go back to a major label.  Hanson have proven to be successful as an indie band - they are making money and sustaining their fanbase.  And they have the freedom to do whatever they want.

miki

"We're just three guys who fell in love with Rock 'n Roll.  Now we're screwed... we have to do this every night."

7/08/98 - 9/30/98 - 6/09/00 - 8/19/00 - 10/23/00 - 9/16/03 - 5/09/04 - 10/26/07 - 10/27/07 - 3/15/08 - 9/21/08 - 5/16/09 - 10/31/09 (reporter!) - 11/05/09

sj0126 sj0126 2009-11-26 19:37:26 -0600
Member since: 2008-01-15 Groups:
Fan Club Member Street Team

yeah exactly. they'd never give that up to go back to have big bosses that they have to get permission from to do anything.

                       12 Years/// 24 shows

Up Next: 5 for 5 in NYC/Bamboozle!

    

imdreamingofike imdreamingofike 2009-11-26 20:27:04 -0600
Member since: 2005-09-19 Groups:
Street Team

Hanson are getting good music out faster now that they are there own label. I sure hope they don't go back to the mainstream crap, but Im not worried. I think they are permently their own own label anyways. I wouldn't worry 2 much.

I am looking forward to the release of Shout It Out on June 1st... Watch out CD stores nationwide.

I heart Ruff Ruffman to and Chet is awesome to and so is Spotnik and then There's Ruff's brother Scruff... lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Rebekah1213 Rebekah1213 2009-11-27 05:01:26 -0600

Whether or not any major companies did ask or not Hanson wouldn't go back. . . they had too many problems with gaining artistic/musical control over their own music. When you have a major company, you gain the promoting and such, but you have do whatever is in your contract (almost of all of the time there is very fine print.) It Hanson a while to break away from Mercury Record, and as they do appreciate the chance to work on a major company, they really want to do their own thing now at their record company.

Parting is such sweet sorrow, but to write is to live forever. So with these words, I leave a piece of me
Adieu,  Chow, until I write again. . .

Rebekah.

EyesWideOpen EyesWideOpen 2009-11-27 07:14:57 -0600
Groups:
Street Team Fan Club Member

QUOTE: sj0126

QUOTE: EyesWideOpen

QUOTE: sj0126

They would never go back. Why bother going back to needing approval for every little thing you want to do if you can just do it the way you want it now? We would never get any Meet and Greets or reporter interviews or Fan Club Members events and they wouldn't tour as much and CDs would take longer if they were on a major label again.

Why do you think we wouldn't get any Meet & greets if they were on a major label? They did those before 3CG too, right? Almost all bands arrange meet& greets before gigs, indie or not. And I doubt it would have any great impact on the intervals between albums, at least generally. Because it was three years between Underneath and The Walk, and it will be three years between The Walk and the next one. Usually major labels push their bands to release albums every two years or so. Otherwise the fans generally move on to new acts. Making of Underneath was a disaster, but it isn't always so.

Now it sounds like I'm defending major labels, and I truly don't want to, I'm very happy about Hanson being indie! I'm just saying that it isn't always so black and white. Some artists -although admittedly very few- manage to strike a deal where they are granted complete artistic freedom with their music, and in those cases staying on a major label can be a good decision

Meet and Greets and reporters as we have it set up through the fan club did not happen til they went indie. There were no fan club members events til they went indie. There weren't any fan club members kits til they went indie. You see my point?

It was two years for the Walk. It'll be 3 til the next CD is released but thats only because they have to set up their international stuff. It used to take them around a year for the label to approve the songs they want to do, or never in the case of Underneath, so that they could start recording and actually start making the record. Now they just do it when they feel they have the right time.

A music artist shouldn't release a CD more then like 2 years apart. Their music can't change that much within a year, you know?

Yeah I do see your point with the members' events and membership kits. But back then we did have at least the MOE magazine and even the MOE CD of old songs. So it wasn't like all that bad. I guess for us outside the US one of the main differences between Hanson's time on Mercury/ IDJ and on their own is that now they spend a lot less time in Europe, Australia, Latin America etc. So in SOME ways you miss the opportunities they had to travel back then etc.

But two years between Underneath and The Walk? Counting how? Underneath was released in April 2004; The Walk came out in Japan in February 2007, in the UK in April 2007 and in the USA in July 2007.

I do understand why it's taking them some time longer with releasing the next album than they originally planned, and it's all okay. It's great if they manage to release the album simultaneously worldwide. I'm just saying that it tends to be the usual three years between the albums anyway. It's just for us fans to try and be a bit more patient, which is hard, I should know!Wink

But really, honestly, I would never wish them to go back to major labels. It has gone really bad in recent years, you can see it in all mainstream music today. Just when you thought the mainstream music scene couldn't get any worse, it keeps getting worse, more standardized and unimaginative all the time. But as Hanson have said, around the time of MON they were still pretty happy being on Mercury. i suppose with TTA things were still good enough.

Despite what I've said I am very happy with the way Hanson and 3cG are handling things, releases and promotion (sure I want more promo in Europe but still). i don't even miss the days when Hanson were the most ubiquitous band on Earth. I would hate it if they had someone telling them what kind of music to write, who is producing it, and when it's going to be released. Things are the best way possible right now. And I have faith it will be better for European fans too, with the new album.

sjo126, I agree, two years is a minimum between albums. Three years, then, that is starting to test my patience...Tongue out  Anyways, the member CDs and EPs are a great help with that.

Are we distracted by the sun/ the glittering jewels and the beating drums/ Is it going the distance we fear?

imdreamingofike imdreamingofike 2009-11-27 09:08:22 -0600
Member since: 2005-09-19 Groups:
Street Team

I like how Hanson gone indie, like the hanson.net stuff and ect. They sure keep in contact with us fans thats for sure. But I must admit I miss moe magazines but still happy that I kept them all.

I am looking forward to the release of Shout It Out on June 1st... Watch out CD stores nationwide.

I heart Ruff Ruffman to and Chet is awesome to and so is Spotnik and then There's Ruff's brother Scruff... lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!

HITZhoney86 HITZhoney86 2009-11-28 13:05:43 -0600
Groups:
Street Team

They would in No way go back... Not with the hell they faced at IDJ then if I remember they had a hard time with Mercury when they were pulling together MoN

When GOD calls you, turn your eyes to the skies and say 'I Hear You'

Hanson Fan Since 1997

Mandy1984 Mandy1984 2009-11-28 13:31:34 -0600
Member since: 2004-04-25 Groups:
Street Team Fan Club Member
I don't think they'd be as accsessible to us if they went back to a major label. I mean think about it. Would they still be able to do their walks? Would they be able to allow the fans to vote on a song for a setlist? Major labels would mean they would push for bigger venues, crappy music, and lack of respect for what Hanson can truely do. Sure, the music critics respect them, otherwise they wouldn't get any coverage at all, but we are the ones who truely know. Why else would we go to multiple shows,sleep on the sidewalk in strange cities, wear their merch like its the most fashionable thing on the planet? Because we know how great they are. Its the fans that respect them, not the major labels. The music industry is crap. The majors a run by a bunch of former teenie boppers in highend suits who pretend to know what they are doing, when in reality, it comes down to the artist. The artists know what feels right to them. That's what should matter. If the major execs say"this is what you want on your record!" While the artist is going"Errr..but... I don't like it"..they end up hating the music. And in turn, we get the crap on the radio.

Grand Prarie 04.Dallas 07.Tulsa 07.OKC 08.Tulsa 08.Dallas 08.Tulsa 09.STL 09.KC 09.Houston 09.Dallas 09.

These words are all I have to give you